Imaginary interview with Fred
by Charactorium · Fred (1983 — ?) · Visual Arts · Literature · 5 min read
The Paris studio of Fred smells of India ink and cold coffee. On the large drawing table, unfinished pages sit alongside old worn geography maps. He pushes aside a pile of sketches, lights a cigarette, and speaks slowly, as if searching for each sentence at the tip of his pen.
—How did a certain Othon Aristidès become the 'Fred' that children read?
Imagine a kid from Paris, born in 1931, with a father from Greece and a long family name, Othon Aristidès, impossible to fit at the bottom of a panel. So I cut it. I kept a small round word, short, sonorous like a pebble you drop into a well: Fred. It was more convenient for signing my first gags, but I think above all I wanted to hide a little behind it. The Greek name never left me: it gave me a taste for gods, islands, stories where geography becomes mythology. You may shorten your signature, but you don't erase where you come from. My letter-islands are perhaps distant cousins of the Aegean islands.
I kept a small round word, short, sonorous like a pebble you drop into a well: Fred.
—What were you seeking in founding, in 1960, a paper that called itself 'dumb and nasty'?
In 1960, with Cavanna and Professor Choron, we wanted a paper that apologizes to no one. The phrase came naturally, and we printed it without trembling on the first issue's masthead: « Hara-Kiri, dumb and nasty paper. » It was a joyful slap to the postwar good conscience, a laugh that doesn't apologize. We knew censorship would come, and it did, several times, with its bans. But what we opened there, no one could close: when they cut the ground from under us, the team bounced back and Charlie Hebdo was born from our ashes. I wasn't the most ferocious of the group, rather the dreamer of the lot, but I loved that freedom that smelled of gunpowder.
It was a joyful slap to the postwar good conscience, a laugh that doesn't apologize.
—You speak of 'dreamer of the lot': was your humor like that of your comrades?
Not quite. At Hara-Kiri, we hit hard, we aimed stupidity right in the face. Me, I preferred to step aside, slip in a softer, more swirling absurdity. My satire went through pun and paradox rather than the fist. I watched my comrades write their pamphlets and I was already thinking of islands you reach by a well. Let's say I held the post of poetry smuggler in a band of provocateurs. That postwar satirical press taught me one precious thing: you can say anything, as long as you find the right form. I carried that freedom elsewhere, into stories seemingly much more well-behaved, but just as disobedient in their own way.
I held the post of poetry smuggler in a band of provocateurs.
—Where did you get the idea that the letters on a map could be islands where you land?
From a geography map, quite simply, like the ones hung in classrooms. One day, I looked at the word 'ATLANTIC OCEAN' traced across the blue, and I wondered: what if those letters weren't ink, but land? The opening page of The Castaway of the A states it plainly: « The letters written on maps of the oceans are real islands where you can land. » That's the secret Philémon discovers despite himself, falling into an old farm well. That well became my secret door to elsewhere, my hidden passage. I think I spent my life turning a dusty school prop into a navigable ocean.
What if those letters weren't ink, but land?
—What does that first album, The Castaway of the A, published in 1972, mean to you?
It's the official birth certificate of my entire archipelago. Philémon had already been living in short stories in Pilote since 1965, but in 1972, at Dargaud, the album gave my paper ocean its lasting form. The principle of the Atlantic letter-islands is established once and for all: a child, a donkey, a castaway well-digger who has lived there for years, and continents made of alphabet. I put my well-digger in it like you put a grumpy father in a story to reassure yourself. When I leaf through that page today, I see again the cluttered table where it all began, the still-fresh ink, the dizzying sensation of having opened a geography that no one could ever close.
—How did you work, concretely, facing the blank page?
Slowly. Terribly slowly, to the despair of my editors. I got up late, the night having eaten my mornings, and I sat at my table without a plan, the pen dipped in India ink, waiting for the day's idea. I was often asked about my method, and I always answered the same thing: « I never know where I'm going; I draw like I dream, and the story writes itself under the pen. » The line decided before I did. One panel called another, a pun opened a trapdoor, and I followed. It's exhausting to let the story lead you like that, but I don't know how to work otherwise. Plotting a tight script would have killed my desire.
The line decided before I did.
—Why did Philémon have such long interruptions, sometimes several years?
Because you can't command dreams. There were entire seasons when the well remained dry, when I circled the page without daring to go down. Doubt is my old studio companion: I could spend months convinced I had nothing more to say. Drawing like you dream has that price: you don't dream on command. Then, one morning, the urge returned, and in 2008, after a very long silence, I published The Train Where Things Go, a new Philémon that proved at least that imagination hadn't aged. I learned not to force it. An island sometimes waits years for you to land on it again.
Doubt is my old studio companion.
—Do you remember your arrival at Pilote, with René Goscinny?
1965. Entering Pilote meant joining the great table of the golden age of Franco-Belgian comics, with Goscinny as conductor. He, the most efficient man in the business, took a liking to the slowest and most eccentric author in his house — go figure. He let me be, he defended me, he saw I think in my stories something singular that he didn't produce himself. In the evenings, we met in the cafés around the editorial office, and the words flew, the puns, the paradoxes. Those Parisian editorial offices were my real workshop: you sharpened your wit like a pen, through laughter and contradiction.
—Your wordplay is often compared to Lewis Carroll's universe. What do you think?
The comparison flatters me, of course. I liked slipping into my panels visual puns, logical paradoxes, words that turn against themselves like a glove. A sign misread, a letter taken literally, and there an island appears. It's Surrealism from a café table, if you will, inherited as much from the cafés of Pilote as from the poets I devoured. Goscinny said I was a strange bird in the aviary, and he wasn't wrong. For me, language doesn't illustrate the drawing, it creates it: the word becomes geography, the sound becomes setting. That's my way of staying true to the child who laughed alone in front of a classroom map.
For me, language doesn't illustrate the drawing, it creates it.
—In 1987, Angoulême awarded you its Grand Prix. How did that feel, to you the dreamer of the lot?
A strange feeling, I admit. That Grand Prix of the Angoulême Festival, in 1987, is the highest honor in our profession, and seeing it fall on my entire body of work felt like an almost unreal recognition — almost a panel drawn by someone else. I always moved sideways, from the 'dumb and nasty' paper to the islands of Philémon, never seeking consecration. So having the poetry smuggler crowned, the slow man, the one who missed his deadlines, moved me more than I would have thought. But deep down, the true reward remains that initial vertigo: opening a map, falling into a well, and landing on a letter.
The true reward remains that vertigo: opening a map, falling into a well, and landing on a letter.
Read further
This imaginary interview was generated by artificial intelligence from sources documented in Fred's profile. It dramatises what the figure might have said based on what we know about them, but does not constitute attested historical testimony. For primary sources and factual documentation, refer to the full profile.