Imaginary interview with Jean Effel
by Charactorium · Jean Effel (1908 — 1982) · Visual Arts · Society · 5 min read
Paris, a gray afternoon in the late 1970s. In a studio-apartment cluttered with boards, bottles of India ink, and stacked collections, a man with a mischievous smile sets down his pen. Jean Effel, born François Lejeune, agrees to tell how a simple round line could, throughout his life, shape worlds and challenge the powerful.
—How did you come up with the idea of portraying a God who tinkers with the world like a craftsman?
I think I never saw Genesis as a solemn text, but as a workshop. In The Creation of the World, in 1951, my Good God is a good-natured bearded man bent over his workbench, shaping man with the bonhomie of a carpenter carving a chair. The angels comment on the work over his shoulder, a little devil gets underfoot, and everything is resolved with tenderness rather than thunder. I wanted people to laugh at the origin of the world without ever mocking it maliciously, as one smiles at a child building a castle. The sacred, when brought close to the workbench, becomes strangely fraternal.
The sacred, when brought close to the workbench, becomes strangely fraternal.
—Why did you extend this fresco all the way to Adam and Eve?
Because once the light and the beasts were made, the most delicate part remained: us. In The Creation of Man, in 1955, then in The Story of Adam and Eve, in 1958, my gardener God kneads the first clay with as much mischief as tenderness, hesitating, starting over, becoming sentimental over his own clumsiness. I liked the idea that Eve was not a punishment but a success that even the Creator marvels at. These are drawings where Genesis ceases to be a lesson and becomes a slightly lopsided, very human love story, where even the little devil gets his share of indulgence.
—Where does this name, Jean Effel, which resembles no other, come from?
From two letters, quite simply. My name is François Lejeune, F dot, L dot. One day I pronounced my initials aloud — "eff-el" — and I heard a name. I Gallicized it, added "Jean," and there you have a short, round, easy-to-remember signature, tailor-made for a newspaper's masthead. There is something amusing about inventing an identity from nothing, from two consonants you've carried since baptism. The cartoonist, after all, spends his life bringing beings to life with a simple line; it was logical that I start by drawing myself a name.
The cartoonist spends his life bringing beings to life with a simple line; it was logical that I start by drawing myself a name.
—They say a little flower hides in your drawings. What does it represent?
My daisy, yes. I slip it somewhere in the scenery, in a patch of grass, at the edge of a cloud, like a second signature, more secret than my name. It's a way of leaving a discreet trace, a wink for those who take the time to look. Signing in full is proclaiming; placing a flower is whispering. I like the reader to become a bit complicit, to search the image and say to themselves: he passed by here. A work always benefits from keeping a little mystery that you don't explain in the caption.
—How can such a gentle line serve such biting satire?
It is precisely the contrast that hits the mark. When I delivered my drawings to the Canard enchaîné, under that round and smiling line, the satire targeted the powerful and defended peace among peoples. A furious pamphlet, you distrust it; but a chubby, disarming little character, you let him in, and that's when he stings. Pen and India ink give such amiable contours that the arrow is already planted before you see it coming. I never believed you had to shout to denounce. Smile is a slow weapon, but it leaves deeper traces than a paving stone.
Smile is a slow weapon, but it leaves deeper traces than a paving stone.
—You also drew a lot for the left-wing press. What were you looking for there?
A popular audience, the kind you reach in a printed satirical newspaper, crumpled at the bottom of a pocket, read at a café counter. Working for L'Humanité as well as Le Canard enchaîné, I could put my line at the service of pacifist and progressive convictions without ever renouncing my gentleness. In my time, there was a flourishing illustrated press, where the drawing counted as much as the article. I believe a well-placed caricature sometimes makes people think more than a long editorial: it engraves itself at a glance, it travels from hand to hand, and it keeps working on the mind long after you've turned the page.
—How do you explain your immense popularity in the Eastern Bloc countries?
My universe found an echo there that I did not expect. As early as 1958, in Prague, The Creation of Man was adapted into an animated film, with my gardener God and his mischievous angels brought to the screen by puppets. There, my pacifism and my tender line spoke to everyone, across borders. In 1968, I received the Lenin Peace Prize, a distinction that touched me because it honored a commitment, not a feat. That my little good-natured God crossed the Iron Curtain to make other children than ours smile, that delights me more than any medal.
—What would you say to those who judge your pacifist commitment too naive?
That gentleness is often confused with naivety. I grew up with the First World War, drew during and after the Second, and saw the Liberation of Paris in 1944; I know perfectly well what war crushes. Choosing peace when you have been through all that is not naive, it is a lucid choice. My good God who makes the world with love, my angels who marvel, these are not daydreams: they are a way of reminding that humanity is better than its massacres. Sometimes it takes a childlike line to tell adults truths they refuse to hear otherwise.
—What did a working day look like in your Parisian studio?
It began with the newspapers. Like any press cartoonist, I read the news upon waking, looking in the news for the spark of an idea, the absurdity of the day that a sketch could turn around. The afternoon belonged to the drawing itself: the pen first, to lay down the outlines, then watercolor and gouache to give my world its tender hues. Always, at the back of my neck, the pressure of deadlines imposed by the editorial offices — the newspaper, after all, knows no inspiration drought. My inclined drawing board was my true home, even more than the apartment around it.
—Do you remember your evenings, once the pen was put down?
They were spent outside, in the cafés and brasseries of Paris, those places of sociability where you met everyone. There I met writers, journalists and pacifist activists, and we remade the world over a few drinks, like my Good God remade his on his workbench. It was the era of the Popular Front, still fresh in memory, of an intellectual effervescence where ideas circulated as fast as cigarette smoke. These conversations fueled my drawings as much as reading the newspapers: a caricature is rarely born alone at the table; it matures in the noise of friendly voices.
—If you had to entrust what you hope to leave behind, what would you answer?
A little tenderness, slipped into a century that sorely lacked it. I spent my life bent over my drawing board, creating a God who tinkers, angels who joke, a lopsided Adam — and hiding my daisy everywhere. If I am remembered as the one who knew how to disarm great subjects — Creation, war, power — with a simple smile of a line, I will be fulfilled. Laughter does not cure everything, but it sometimes prevents despair. And that, for a man who never held anything but a pen, seems to me already a fine creation.
Laughter does not cure everything, but it sometimes prevents despair.
Read further
This imaginary interview was generated by artificial intelligence from sources documented in Jean Effel's profile. It dramatises what the figure might have said based on what we know about them, but does not constitute attested historical testimony. For primary sources and factual documentation, refer to the full profile.